CAM or sham? Let’s get the facts on vitamins and supplements
Rachel Dunlop wants transparency in current regulation system
Read More CAM or sham? Let’s get the facts on vitamins and supplements
regulation
Can regulatory impact processes benefit consumers?
Ian Jarrett urges consumer groups to comment on the Productivity Commission’s draft report.
Read More Can regulatory impact processes benefit consumers?
Is consumer benefit missing from regulation analysis?
CALC has urged the Productivity Commission to place more focus on consumers in Regualtory Impact Analyses.
Read More Is consumer benefit missing from regulation analysis?
Regulatory Impact Analysis: Benchmarking study
The Australian Government, with the agreement of Council of Australian Governments (COAG)’s Business Regulation and Competition Working Group, has requested that the Productivity Commission undertake a benchmarking study into regulatory impact analysis (RIA) processes.
Read More Regulatory Impact Analysis: Benchmarking study
PC to study regulatory impact processes
Post thumbnailConsumer groups have long been concerned about the flaws and biases of regulatory impact analysis. Australian government’s have asked the Productivity Commission to conduct a review.
Read More PC to study regulatory impact processes
The “Nanny State” cleans up at IQ squared debate
“Nanny state” is an ideological term invented by extremists to deride the innovations of modern law and government designed to offer consumers and citizens protections from risks that it is unreasonable to place on individuals alone. Of course many who now use the term d so innocently and now are merely concerned that in some…
Read More The “Nanny State” cleans up at IQ squared debate